E. (1985)patibility during the moms and dad-baby relationship: Sources and processes

E. (1985)patibility during the moms and dad-baby relationship: Sources and processes

Mutton, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If the I’m not sensuous, could you be hot or perhaps not?: Physical-elegance ratings and relationships tastes just like the a function of a person’s individual elegance. Mental Research, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other personal relationship. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of ambition. Inside J. McV. Search (Ed.), Personality therefore the choices problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Push. [ Links ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship dating fate that have insiders’ and you will outsiders’ perspective: Just who and you can what is actually requested things. Private Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital high quality inside newlyweds: Several dependent method. Journal from Identity and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]

Legitimizing activities in the initiation away from heterosexual dating

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. Roentgen. (2006). Sensed similarity and you may dating victory certainly relationship lovers: A keen idiographic strategy. Journal out-of Social and private Relationships, 23, 865-880. [ Links ]

Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Report for the Pew Web sites & American Lives Opportunity. Retrieved , out of [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Examining the precision away from predictions in the matchmaking relationships: How and just why create lovers’ forecasts change from those people created by perceiver? Identity and Public Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Website links ]

This new appeal-resemblance theory one of cross-sex members of the family: Relationships pleasure, sensed parallels, and you can mind-helping perceptions

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Report demonstrated on Earliest International Fulfilling with the Private Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]

Merkle, Age.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.An effective. (2000). Digital matchmaking and you may virtual related: Conceptualizing computer mediated intimate dating. Family, 44, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Yards., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is genuine resemblance very important to attraction? Good meta-study out of real and you may observed similarity. Record from Societal and personal Dating, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Relationship fulfillment given that a beneficial predictor away from resemblance analysis; https://datingmentor.org/cs/feabie-recenze/ A test of one’s destination-resemblance hypothesis. Record out-of Public and private Relationship, 22, 561-584. [ Links ]

Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of your own SVR concept from dyadic combining. Log from ily, 44, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: An excellent fourteen-season longitudinal examination of black colored people and you can white lovers. Journal of Societal and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). New love formula Fits thinks it offers located a formula having ruling the web dating organization: A technical way to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Correct. Providers dos.0 Mag. Retrieved on off [ Website links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent endure – Identification parallels during the lovers. Identification and Personal Variations, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Companion needs: What characteristics do folk desire in their small-identity sexual and you will enough time-name close partners? Diary from Therapy and you will People Sex, twelve, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh role of your self on initiation and you may span of personal communication. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Abrir chat
¿Necesitas ayuda?
Hola, gracias por contactarnos, ¿como podemos ayudarte?